|
I'd like to relate a few of my adventures
from my years as a TM meditator and teacher.
PART I: SOMETHING GOOD IS HAPPENING!
At TM introductory lectures no mention
is made that there could be any unpleasant experiences
associated with TM. True to it's nature as an
"esoteric" teaching (a teaching with many hidden
levels of indoctrination), TM keeps the fact of
possible negative experiences from the student
until he is already past the first level of initiation.
Only after initiation, on one of the "Three Nights
After Initiation,"is the concept of "unstressing"
introduced.
TM doctrine teaches that all (absolutely
all!) personal difficulties and restrictions
are caused by "stress," which is some "abnormality"
in the "nervous system." If we could free ourselves
of stress we would be able to experience "pure
consciousness" at all times. That is, we would
be in "Cosmic Consciousness" (CC) and would be
blissful and would effortlessly perform "spontaneous
right actions" at all times. Furthermore, these
"right actions" would enjoy the "support of Nature"
and would therefore be successful. This is the
"normal" state of life that would be enjoyed by
all people if only the "stress" weren't in the
way.
Notice, by the way, that we just
said that this "simple relaxation exercise" is
supposed to produce people who are morally perfect,
people who will "perform spontaneous right action"
in everything they think or do. Also they will
receive "support" from something called "Nature."
Yet TMers deny to the public that theirs is in
any way a spiritual or religious teaching.
This is one example of the fact
that TM is an esoteric spiritual system where
the full truth is revealed in degrees only as
one becomes more deeply indoctrinated. Students
are told in the "Three Nights after Initiation"
that a mere "twenty minutes twice a day" (20x2)
of meditation is enough to produce CC. This is
a deliberate misrepresentation of actual "insider"
TM doctrine. MMY told us on Teacher Training Course
(TTC) that mere 20x2 meditation would not
produce CC, but that we should continue telling
people that it would. Only long "rounding" (see
below) courses could produce CC, he said, but
once we got people doing 20x2 meditation then
maybe they would come to longer courses so we
weren't really lying. This is an example of TM-style
"spin doctoring" directly from the Master.
This is also an example of how people
are deceived about TM doctrine even after they
are initiated. As a teacher I frequently lied
to people "for their own good" because "they weren't
ready yet" to receive the full truth, and so did
my friends who were teachers. We didn't think
of it as "lying." We thought we were giving the
people as much truth as they could handle. We
thought it would be wrong to tell them more than
they could handle since they might "misunderstand"
and not start or continue with TM, which would
be bad for them.
We did a lot of "spin doctoring."
We deceived people by deliberately using words
that would be misunderstood by the audience. We
said "TM is not a religion" even though we knew
that insider TM doctrine as a whole was incompatible
with all major religions (including mainstream
Hinduism in large part). But we didn't think of
ourselves as "lying" because we were mentally
using a very restrictive definition of "religion,"
using the word to mean something like "an organization
that demands faith in a doctrine." Even though
we were teaching doctrine incompatible
with other religions we weren't demanding faith
so TM was "not a religion." We ignored the fact
that people could be and were kicked out of the
Movement for openly disputing TM doctrine -- we
didn't consider this as "demanding faith," rather
it was "protecting the purity of the teaching."
But I digress. TM doctrine declares
that the "deep rest" produced by TM is the answer
to this barrier of stress that is keeping us from
CC. Stress is only removed by rest. The rest of
sleep is supposed to be able to remove casual,
surface-level stress. However, the rest of sleep
is insufficient to remove the deeper, more serious,
more obstreperous stresses "deep in the nervous
system" that are keeping us from being morally
perfect, happy, and successful.
TM doctrine says that only by experiencing
the much deeper rest of TM can these deeper stresses
be removed. Since this involves a physical purification
of the nervous system there can be physical and
emotional experiences associated with this purification
("we all know how emotions are affected by our
physical state"). These experiences can be pleasant
or unpleasant, but the quality of the experiences
is completely irrelevant. The only important thing
is that stresses are being removed and we are
closer to our goal of CC and even higher states
of consciousness (including "God Consciousness"
(GC)!). One is just supposed to ignore the experiences
associated with "unstressing" and "return to the
mantra." The whole thing sounds very innocuous
as presented in the "Three Nights after Initiation."
What one doesn't hear about on these
three nights of post-trance indoctrination (more
on this below) is the concept of "heavy unstressing."
A meditator usually only receives doctrinal instruction
regarding heavy unstressing on "residence courses"
where one goes off for several days of peace and
quiet plus the opportunity to meditate more than
just 20x2. There he may learn that if a major
stress is released there can be negative physical
and emotional experiences long after the meditation
is over.
And these major stresses are more
likely to be released on a residence course. This
is because this is where the "prolonged deep rest"
over a period of days is supposed to produce rest
deep enough and prolonged enough to attack those
whopper stresses that are really impacting our
lives and keeping us from CC. The experience of
having these major stresses "unstressed" can be
emotionally and physically very uncomfortable,
but we should just keep meditating and should
be happy the stress is on the way out.
But we should never make
important decisions while on a residence course
because our decision-making process is clouded
by the process of stress release. (Actually, the
reason we shouldn't make major decisions is because
we are in a trance state so much that we can become
dissociated -- more on this below).
Note that according to TM doctrine
there is no possible excuse for abandoning
TM. If you feel great it's because you practice
TM and you should therefore continue meditating.
If you feel absolutely miserable it's because
"Something good is happening!" (a major TM catch
phrase) in that those bad old stresses are being
released, you should therefore continue meditating.
TM is working its wonders no matter what
happens to you in your life!
Anyway, this "heavy unstressing"
is something that the Movement doesn't talk about
in public, and that MIU doesn't do four-color
bar charts on. The experience of "heavy unstressing"
is real and fairly common, regardless of whether
you accept TM doctrinal explanations for the cause
of it. A significant number of people come home
even from weekend residence courses with very
uncomfortable negative emotional overcasts, and
similar problems can occur even for 20x2 meditators.
What is a "significant number of people"? Enough
people so that all TM "checkers" and teachers
are taught how to help people with such problems.
On a long course, such as a Teacher
Training Course (TTC), heavy unstressing is a
major fact of life for many people. My TTC (the
"Mallorca/Fiuggi Fonte Course" circa '72) was
infamous for the "heavy unstressing" that went
on. One TTC staffer (for any TM historical buffs
this was Billy Clayton who was a "skin boy," one
of MMY's personal attendants who carried MMY's
deerskin and laid for him to sit on) called this
the "General Hospital" TTC because so many people
had severe problems.
At one point we were "rounding"
for 14 hours a day! A "round" is a period of meditation
followed by a period of yoga postures or "asanas."
Meditation, asanas, meditation, asanas, etc. etc.
etc. for 14 hours a day, day after day. At other
points in the course we rounded fewer hours a
day which gave us time for hours and hours of
indoctrination sessions. This went on for a minimum
of three months for everyone, but there were people
like me there for six months and even longer doing
this.
It was very common for people to
acquire major tics of large muscle groups, most
commonly in the form of very noticeable head jerks.
I'm talking about sudden jerks of the head to
right or left of about 45 degrees. In addition
there were people with major emotional problems.
MMY had to establish "heavy unstressing clinics."
At attempt was made to help unstressors at these
clinics by application of physical therapies including
body massage and foot massage.
Several people were not able to
become TM teachers at this course because they
were not able to free themselves of the major
body tics before it was time to "receive their
mantras." MMY could not send people back to their
communities as official "Exponents of Reality"
when they had been so conspicuously damaged by
the TTC experience.
One course participant went home
and was hospitalized for mental difficulties by
his father, a psychiatrist. MMY was quite disturbed
by this event (he of course particularly wanted
the endorsement of psychiatrists) and he discussed
this negative turn of events in an open session.
I met another course acquaintance again after
I "graduated" TTC and returned to the LA area,
and she was still having very conspicuous and
embarrassing major head jerks. I myself managed
to overcome my physical tics in time to become
a teacher, but I went home in a very strange mental
state. (More on this below.)
I stayed on for a month after the
official TTC ended to witness the taping of the
original "Science of Creative Intelligence" course
by MMY. MMY was openly unhappy by the amount of
"heavy unstressing" that had gone on (again, that's
how we heard about the psychiatrist's son). His
position was that the course selection process
had let too many people into the course who "weren't
ready" for the dramatic evolutionary power unleashed
by such prolonged meditation.
In fact "heavy unstressing" is never
considered to be caused by "something wrong with
TM." It is considered to be a fact of life which
must be faced by anyone who wants to attain the
happiness of CC. TMers are told that the answer
to unstressing is to ignore it and keep meditating
on their regular schedule. If a person stops meditating,
according to TM doctrine, the stress is left in
an "unstressing" state and the negative experiences
will continue indefinitely. Sometimes a person
is advised to reduce their time of meditation,
and in extreme cases meditation is temporarily
replaced by a body awareness practice called "feeling
the body," but TM itself cannot be dropped permanently
without bad consequences.
Supposedly, if a person keeps on
as instructed the stress will ultimately be unstressed
and the person will be forever free of it. This
hope is what keeps people meditating through some
excruciating emotional experiences. They can't
stop TM no matter how horrible they feel. The
worse they feel, and the longer they suffer, the
bigger the stress is that they are unstressing,
and the more important it is to continue TM and
get that stress completely unstressed. According
to TM doctrine, there is never a good reason
to give up TM -- the worse things get for you
the more you need TM.
When someone does the unthinkable
and gives up TM anyway as a result of heavy unstressing
everyone is sorry they stopped. But they feel
that (1) the person is better off as result of
the evolution they did gain before quitting
and the person will be in a better position to
march towards CC in their next life and (2) it's
just too bad they were too weak to face the unstressing,
keep meditating, and overcome the stress in this
life. There is never a thought among the hard-core
that perhaps TM itself is at fault in some way,
or even that TM just wasn't right for that person,
or that the person is in fact worse off
for having done TM.
There is another danger from heavy
TM involvement other than from heavy unstressing.
So let me start over and tell my story again from
a different angle.
PART II: SPIRITUAL COUNSELLING
FROM THE MASTER
The religious (or spiritualistic,
or psychic, or occult -- take your pick) side of
TM was covered up in the "great scientification"
of TM in the '70s. I was first introduced to this
side of TM by knowing Helena Olsen. She was the
woman whose family took MMY in as a houseguest in
LA during his first tour around the world. MMY affectionately
called her "Mother Olsen."
She described the experiences of
hosting MMY in her book A Hermit in the House
. She herself told me the Movement asked her to
pull this book from publication because it presented
MMY as a Hindu spiritual teacher and presented
TM as a spiritual teaching, which conflicted with
the newly mandated "scientific" presentation of
TM. The book documents the early days of the "Spiritual
Regeneration Movement" when the publicly avowed
goal of this Movement (that's where the phrase
"the Movement" came from) was to "spiritually
regenerate the world." The Movement at least presented
an honest face to the public back then.
She had become a teacher on one
of the "India courses," the TTCs conducted before
"scientification," and she had had extensive doctrinal
instruction from MMY over the course of many years.
At the time I met her, she and her husband (a
phone company executive) were running the "American
Meditation Society" which attempted to reach business
executives similarly to the way that the Student's
International Meditation Society (SIMS) was targeting
the student population. (AMS was short lived.)
Helena Olsen introduced me to such
ideas as that there were "dangers" from negative
spiritual powers at "subtle levels of the mind"
without the "protection" of the mantra. She also
talked about Hindu deities (now called "manifestations
of Creative Intelligence") making it clear that
subtle levels of the mind were well populated
("anything that you can name exists"). This was
no big deal to TM teachers who had gone to the
"India courses" before scientification but this
was inside knowledge for a new initiate of the
scientific 70's. She was merely introducing me
to what had been taught before the "science" facade
began to be painted on. My attention definitely
began to focus on the hidden spiritualistic side
of TM.
Note that my current objections
to TM are not based on the fact that MMY
was and is teaching Hindu thought and practice
(although quite modified from traditional
Hinduism). My concern, as you will see, is that
MMY is at the very least a dishonest and incompetent
teacher of Hindu thought and practice.
Anyway, I went to a seven day residence
course, got good and dissociated from spending
many more hours in trance (meditation) every day
and I soon had an experience wherein I felt the
spiritual presence of the late "Guru Dev" (as
MMY's teacher is usually called by TMers). I "knew"
that Guru Dev wanted me to go to TTC and become
a TM teacher. Back home I checked with Mrs. Olsen
who felt that the experience was valid. She endorsed
my TTC application, and soon I withdrew from UCLA
and was on a plane to TTC on the island of Mallorca.
And (unfortunately as it later turned out) I had
enough money to pay for six months of TTC rather
than just the required three.
TTC involved hours of "rounding"
alternated with daily hours of doctrinal instruction
from MMY. For some reason we later had to move
the course to Italy, so we had to "come down"
in the number of "rounds" we were doing so that
we wouldn't be too dissociated to deal with the
practical requirements of travel (this wasn't
the doctrinal explanation for why we had to reduce
rounds).
After the course moved to Italy,
we came "up" in rounds again, I began having severe
headaches. I went to see Helena Olsen, who was
also at the course to visit MMY, for help. She
decided that my problem was that my evolution
had advanced so rapidly that I was experiencing
my mantra at extremely fine levels of thought,
which I didn't know how to handle yet. She was
quite happy for my spiritual progress and said
that I should talk personally to MMY because I
should have an advanced technique. She took me
to see him. We caught him as he got off of a helicopter
after looking over real estate for the newly proposed
Maharishi International University (MIU). But
he only said that he'd see me the end of my TTC.
More rounding and indoctrination,
rounding and indoctrination, rounding and indoctrination.
For weeks and weeks, and months and months. (Combined
with "heavy unstressing" as described above.)
During TTC we listened to an audio
tape where MMY explained why TM had to be presented
in the context of science. He said that the world
was just not ready to receive the spiritual message,
and therefore we had to present TM in ways that
the world understood and respected. Someday, he
said, we would be able to present TM using the
"sweet language" of spirituality again. We were
played another tape wherein MMY described TM's
relationship to all other spiritual teachings.
TM, he said, was like the trunk and roots of a
large tree. All other spiritual teachings were
like branches emerging from the tree. These other
spiritual teachings contained, at best, only parts
of the truth. Each of the world's "great religions"
represented whatever parts of the truth that could
be sustained within the cultural context in which
the religion developed. Only TM contained the
entire spiritual truth, and we were part of the
great effort to reveal this truth once again to
the world.
Well, when I was finally ready to
go home at the end of the SCI extension MMY did
in fact give me my "advanced technique" which
just involved adding a "shri" to my mantra. He
also gave me my teacher mantras since my head
jerks had stopped when I had come down to two
meditations a day, and I went home. But I was
still suffering from severe dissociation (as I
nowunderstand the condition) and from ever
increasingly bizarre and powerful "spiritual experiences"
(as I then understood the condition).
These problems really threw me for
a loop. At home I was so dissociated I wasn't
certain I properly remembered my teacher mantras.
This was extremely distressing to someone as dedicated
as I was. I had to go up to Humboldt College to
see MMY at a TTC-prep course he was giving there
to have the mantras verified. After I went home
again I was still too dissociated and self-absorbed
in an increasingly fantastic inner "spiritual"
world to continue my studies. I could not handle
the real world because of the dissociation, and
I did not care about the real world because I
was becoming so "spiritual" and the focus of my
attention was increasingly being focused on TM
spirituality. I walked away from my classes and
drove up from UCLA to the ATR course (a sort of
R&R for TM teachers) that MMY was conducting
near UC Santa Barbara. This is where MMY accepted
me into "M-group" ("monastic-group," a group of
teachers dedicated to celibacy) and where he privately
accepted my personal offer of love and service
to him as my spiritual Master.
Shortly after that I went up to
Santa Barbara again to stay for a week or so at
the rented college dormitory which by now being
used as the first MIU campus. MMY was in residence
there overseeing the founding of MIU. Someone
close to MMY had suggested to me that I might
be able to get on MMY's staff. I got there before
MMY arrived and helped this person prepare MMY's
apartment for his arrival -- everything had to
be extraordinarily clean. After his arrival, I
helped the skin-boys a few times with some of
their chores such as spot-cleaning MMY's dhotis
(the white robes). Mostly I spent a lot of time
in a small group of people who were listening
to the first MIU catalog being read to MMY for
his approval. One such meeting was conducted at
the beach estate of one of the Beach Boys.
I remember vividly the absolute
command that MMY held over those around him in
these very private sessions. I remember how intelligent
and sophisticated and forceful he was. There was
no "giggling guru" stuff in these private sessions.
He displayed all the talents and abilities that
could have made him a very successful executive
in any secular business enterprise. I was never
after able to believe that anyone in the Movement
was able to institute any major policy that MMY
didn't approve of. Such belief is a major way
TMers rationalize the insanity of the Movement;
they say "MMY just couldn't know about this" thinking
that he is a simple other-worldly sort of person
who has only a loose grasp on his underlings.
I had a couple of opportunities
to privately relate some of my "spiritual" experiences
to him, including an ever deeper awareness on
my part of my dedication to him as my spiritual
Master. MMY approved of the direction things were
going for me.
Finally, during this same stay at
the "MIU campus" I had very dramatic "spiritual"
realization one night. The next morning I waited
for MMY and walked with him to his car (he was
heading out to view potential Academy real estate
in the Santa Barbara hills) to confirm this new
realization. I said to him "I am a rishi." For
those not familiar with the term, I was telling
him that I could cognize ultimate spiritual truths
for myself. This was a truly incredible
delusion on my part, yet he replied "Yes" in an
affirmative tone. I said "What should I do?" He
replied "Be practical in society."
That evening I additionally "cognized"
that I was not really human. I was an incarnated
"deva" (analogous to an angel) and, what's more,
so was MMY. We had been peers working together
on a spiritual plane as "devas" for aeons. But
I had done something spiritually wrong (the fallen
angel gig) whereas MMY had continued on a spiritually
upward path. Now MMY had deserved to incarnate
here and lead the spiritual regeneration of this
planet, and I was getting a chance to incarnate
here also as a human being and redeem myself by
helping him.
I wanted to "verify this with the
Master" also, so I followed MMY into an elevator
as he was on his way to his rooms after the evening
meeting. As he turned about to face the door I
started opening my mouth to tell him this "cognition."
He looked into my eyes and interrupted me by saying
forcefully "What you have in your mind is right!
-- be practical in society." Then the elevator
door opened and he walked out of the elevator
and off into his rooms.
Well, after having the greatest
Master on the planet confirm my spiritual status,
I didn't question it. Based on a series of continuing
"cognitions" I dropped out of college and embarked
on eleven years of making important personal decisions
based on these delusions, and living in a fantastic
and increasingly horrific inner world based upon
these delusions. The personal sufferings from
mistaken personal choices and from this deluded
mental state were excrutiating.
Finally someone was able to successfully
help me to question the basic unproven assumption
underlying my delusions. This assumption, this
belief that had been programmed into me since
I first walked into an introductory lecture, was
the premise that "MMY is a great spiritual teacher
with the highest teaching on the planet." After
I finally realized that I had absolutely no basis
for believing this, and after I further realized
that this was even quite unlikely based
on what I had gone through, I was finally able
to start recovering. Once I realized that MMY
was at best an incompetent spiritual teacher the
whole set of delusions based on the indoctrination
I'd received, and based on his private "spiritual
counseling," began to fall like a house of cards.
One of the people who helped in
my recovery was Dr. Margaret Singer at UC Berkeley,
one of the world's foremost experts in the study
of destructive cults and their use of "mind control"
(or "thought reform" as it's more commonly called
by researchers). She had been studying TM and
was quite interested in hearing my TM experiences.
She confirmed that a significant percentage of
the population (I've read elsewhere that it is
10-15%) are highly susceptible to post-trance
indoctrination. That is, such people are likely
to have a severely reduced level of critical evaluation
about anything that they are told immediately
after they come out of a trance state. These people
are therefore in particular very susceptible to
any spiritual indoctrination received while they
are in such a post-trance state.
Well, TM is a trance-induction technique
and almost all TM indoctrination is conducted
after meditation while the student is in a post-trance
state. The TM technique itself is taught only
after the student witnesses a pujathat is likely
to induce trance in many. The "Three Nights after
Initiation" indoctrination is always given right
after the "group meditation." And I had six months
of almost continuous post-trance indoctrination
at TTC, not to mention the residence courses that
I had attended prior to TTC. Dr. Singer considered
TM indoctrination such as I had experienced at
TTC to be among the most powerful of any group
she had studied. Dr. Singer also said she had
talked to many TMers who were graduates of long
rounding courses. She considered dissociation
and induced psychosis to be a very real risk of
heavy TM involvement. (She also said that many
people react very badly to any form of
extended relaxation practice and such practices
are therefore not a general panacea.)
Mine was admittedly a much more
intense experience of the destructive nature of
MMY's influence than most people ever get. Why
bring it up then? To let people know what TM is
like at its esoteric core where MMY gives personal
instruction. This may make some of the outer eccentricities
of the Movement seem more explicable. Most TMers
think "Yes, this is not the way things should
be, but MMY would correct it if he knew about
it!," but I assert that the Movement is the way
it is because of MMY rather than despite
him. And my story may make someone think twice
about starting or continuing with TM. Even though
few will suffer as much as I did, every step further
into TM involvement is a step towards experiences
like mine. A desire to warn people is my only
motivation for publicly revealing these events.
Go ahead and remotely psychoanalyze
my own weaknesses that may also have contributed
to this very real personal tragedy if you want,
but don't lose sight of MMY's role in this. He's
at best an incompetent teacher, and at worst he's
also malicious or crazy. He is completely unworthy
of any trust.
PART III: BEWARE OF SCORPIONS!
I don't attribute any malicious
motives to those defending TM, even when they attack
me personally. I know that I had no malicious motives
when Iused to defend TM, and I would have
been pretty ticked after reading this story because
of all the "harm" I would have foreseen from the
"misunderstanding" it would cause.
A TM apologist who has internalized
the TM Prime Directive (see below) just "knows"
that there is nothing wrong with either MMY or
with TM. So there must be something wrong with
me! But they are just trying to defend Truth against
Untruth. They are just trying to protect the public
from being being confused and thus being denied
the "benefits" of TM. Sometimes they get a little
aggressive and forget to "speak the sweet truth,"
but then they see me as being pretty aggressive
by posting this story.
There are only a few responses that
a fully believing TMer can have to my story. The
absolutely unquestionable core of TM doctrine,
the ultimate foundation of the TM belief system,
the TM "Prime Directive" (my term), is that MMY
is a great spiritual teacher with the highest
teaching on the planet. Fully indoctrinated TMers
have been induced to accept this without the slightest
objective proof.
Based on prior experience (I posted
an earlier version of my story to alt.meditation.transcendental
in 1993), I have found that for someone who accepts
the Prime Directive there are only a few possible
explanations for my telling this story to the
public, and these explanations tend to fall into
categories. I'm going to go through some of them,
along with my responses, so that I won't have
to keep responding to them individually if they
pop up again.
Category 1: "Malicious motivation"
(1a) One explanation is that
I am maliciously making this all up. This is because
I am anti-spiritual, or anti-Hindu, or anti-something-else.
Or I am just generally hateful and want to bring
down anything that is good and pure, and TM is the
most good and pure thing on the planet. Consider
the saint who tried to save the scorpion from drowning
and got stung. He tried to save the scorpion again,
and got stung again. When asked why he persisted
in the face of such treatment, the saint explained
that it was his nature to try to save, and the scorpion's
nature to sting. I'm just a scorpion.
My response: I can't prove my motivations.
I assert that my motivations are to help other
people avoid having their minds abused, and incidentally
to also avoid having their finances abused, by
warning them about MMY and TM.
(1b) Another variation on (1) is
that I am in cahoots with, or am influenced by,
the nefarious "TM-EX" organization which is some
sort of cabal that makes money by telling lies
about TM and by then charging people for anti-TM
materials and for needless "exit counseling."
Anyone who charges money like that is suspect.
My response: Note that it is perfectly
fine for the Movement to make millions because
"that's different." There is also room for concern
in that destructive cults have a real animosity
for cult education organizations and "exit counsellors."
Category 2: "Unreliability"
(2a) There are several approaches
to arguing that I am just not in touch with reality.
One argument is that I am just experiencing "heavy
unstressing" and the whole story above is itself
a distortion that originates from this unstressing.
It's too bad I didn't continue meditating and finish
getting rid of this particular stress, which must
be a really huge one.
My response: This argument is pretty
hard-core and will probably not be offered for
public consumption, although will seem possible
to hard-core TMers. If you accept TM dogma then
the "unstressing" theory becomes a real possibility.
If you don't accept TM dogma, then you're probably
already skipping on to...
(2b) Another variation on (2) that
is more suitable for public consumption is this:
I have already admitted to having had delusions
about spiritual experiences, so I could also be
having delusions about the things that I claim
MMY said to me. You can not trust that anything
I described ever actually occurred as I described
it.
My response: You'll have to make
your best guess as to my reliability. There is
also room for concern in that this is a classic
dodge that destructive cults use in response to
charges from persons damaged by cult experiences:
"That person admits to having had severe
problems so they are untrustworthy!." This is
a Catch 22 in that we can only trust tales of
abuse from those who have not been abused.
(2c) A subtler variation is: Every
organization, no matter how wonderful it is, will
have disgruntled people leaving it. These disgruntled
people view all of their experiences with the
organization through the lens of their disgruntlement.
You can't trust the objectivity of someone who
is disgruntled.
My response: Why are we asked to
believe that only people who are "gruntled" can
be objective? Also note we have Catch 22 again
in that we should only listen to the complaints
of those who have no complaints.
(2d) Another variation on (2) is:
Every organization has people joining it who have
unreasonable expectations. I was undoubtedly looking
for something in TM that TM never claimed to offer.
I may have been looking for a "God" in MMY, rather
than just doing the TM technique and receiving
The Knowledge he teaches.
My response: All I can say is that
he accepted a Master-disciple relationship between
us, was told everything that was going
on with me, had ample opportunity to personally
correct me, but never did. As I've said, he is
at best an incompetent teacher.
Category 3: "Take the moral high
ground"
TM apologists like to take the
moral high ground. They will argue that those who
promote TM are being "positive" because they are
saying "good things," whereas I am being "negative"
because I am saying "bad things." You don't want
to listen to someone who is so "negative," do you?
My response: Hmmm...yelling "Don't
stand in front of that moving truck!" is "negative,"
isn't it?
Category 4: "It's all a misunderstanding"
Those who are inclined to be
charitable towards me (which I do appreciate) tend
to argue that I may be basically of good intention
but I had undoubtedly failed to properly understand
MMY's responses to me. The whole episode is tragic
but was based on my misunderstanding. It was completely
reasonable, somehow, for MMY to say "what you have
in your mind is right" to me without even listening
to what I had in my mind, even though he had verbally
accepted my discipleship several months before,
and even after he had confirmed that morning that
I was a rishi.
My response: As I've said, I think
this whole thing demonstrates that MMY is at best
an incompetent spiritual teacher.
Category 5: "Master knows best"
As a last ditch defense it can
be argued that the Master always knows what he is
doing but his purposes may not be understandable
by others who are at a lesser state of spiritual
attainment. What MMY said to me was perfect for
my spiritual needs at the time, even if I can't
understand why. If I had remained faithful to the
Master all would have been made clear.
My response: This argument is also
pretty hard-core and is not often offered for
public consumption. There is also room for concern
in that this is another classic cult dodge, "Everything
The Leader does is by definition correct!"
Well, those are the kinds of arguments
that were offered last time. All arguments involved
either an "ad hominem" attack ("blame the victim"),
or involved "spin doctoring," or involved the
last ditch irrefutable argument of "Master knows
best."
Again, MMY and TM can't lose. Anyone
who thinks TM is a good thing should be respected
and listened to, but if anyone has a serious objection
to TM then please refer to (1) through (5) above.
To the fully indoctrinated TM apologist it is
absolutely inconceivable that MMY could be at
fault, or that TM could be less than the highest
teaching on the planet. For the fully indoctrinated
everything, including my little story, has to
be explained in the light of the Prime Directive.
Of course there are also a good
many meditators reading this who do notfind
my story inconceivable, just hard to accept. You
have not internalized the Prime Directive but
you probably still think TM is generally a good
thing. Your opinion of TM is based on the fact
that you've only personally seen and heard good
things.
Perhaps you are a 20x2 meditator
and are enjoying the benefits of deep relaxation
without having really internalized the indoctrination.
(Not everyone falls completely over for post-trance
indoctrination!) MMY seems like a good sort, and
at worst harmless. The TM teachers seem a bit
spacey and pompous. The exaggerated pronouncements
of the TM Movement are laughable. But so what?
What's the big fuss? It seems harmlessly eccentric
at worst and actually does seem to do some good!
This was the attitude of the largest percentage
of meditators when I was involved. You've never
seen or heard anything like what I am describing.
You are perhaps thinking that what I am describing
is theoretically possible, but it doesn't correlate
to your experiences.
Well, to these people I can only
say this: I think that your position is quite
reasonable! All I can do is tell you what I learned
and experienced through TM and then let you draw
your own conclusions. Be sure to keep an open
mind though. You might try getting the TM packet
from the Cult Awareness Network and you might
contact TM-EX (note to conspiracy theorists: I
have no affiliation with TM-EX, not so much as
even a fee-splitting arrangement!). If you're
reluctant to expose yourself to "negativity" about
TM then beware, you might possibly be succumbing
to indoctrination already!
If you're already a 20x2 meditator
then don't let them get you on a rounding
course, even for a weekend. As a matter of fact,
keeping your wallet and checkbook in your pants
or purse has the almost magical effect of protecting
you from the worst negative effects of TM, both
the unstressing effects and the indoctrination
effects. This is because you have to pay for most
of the opportunities to have your mind really
blasted. If you've already paid for 20x2 (I hope
you got it before the prices went up), and if
you like it, then of course go ahead and do it,
but don't let it get past that. And if you start
feeling bad effects from 20x2, give it up. You're
strong enough to live life without TM! -- if you
think you're not you should also consider whether
you may be succumbing to indoctrination.
Of course, my critics could also
be right about me, about my base motivations and
my negativity and my unreliability and all. So
do your own research and then you be the
judge about TM. You're going to be the judge anyway!
Personally I wouldn't recommend touching TM with
a ten-foot pole.
There are too many methods of secular
stress reduction, techniques that don't come with
so many destructive side effects, that don't have
so much weird mental input ("The Maharishi Effect,"
"Maharishi X" (substitute almost anything for
"X" with more strange developments always appearing)),
that don't weaken you by teaching you how not
to deal with your problems ("just meditate and
act"), that don't lie to you ("CC for just 20
minutes twice a day"), that don't always have
newly invented courses or initiations to pay for,
that don't produce dissociation, and that don't
encourage people to develop and maintain destructive
delusions.
As I said, there are secular stress
reduction techniques (take a look at Benson's
The Relaxation Response ). For those who
want to pursue Enlightenment there are many respectable
Eastern practices. And there are of course spiritual
practices in other religious traditions. Just
find a group or teacher that promotes true personal
growth, that takes care of people rather than
abusing them, and that respects individual free
will by allowing people to know the doctrines
and practices of the group beforethey submit
their hearts and minds to to the group's care.
|