|
Donna
Karan spent more than $1 million on a 128-page
"stand alone
insert" for "Vanity Fair". The insert was
published and circulated shrink-wrapped with the
popular "Hollywood [April] Issue" of the magazine.
Featured within are DKNY's collection
of clothing and accessories. But slipped inside
along with plentiful photographs of models posing
in Karan's fashions is a list of "our
favorite classes". This is a perforated easy-to-remove
inserted card which seems to reflect a seemingly
fashionable pick of the best classes available--from
"wrestling" to "skateboarding" in the "Big Apple".
One such class chosen by DKNY for its list under
"Yoga" was "Integral Yoga International" (IYI)
located at 227 West 13th Street and 200 West 72nd
Street in Manhattan.
The IYI classes cited are
associated with the teachings of a controversial
Indian guru named "Sri Swami Satchidananda". The
Swami also maintains an isolated ashram called
"Yogaville"
in Virginia, which is the home of many of his
most devoted followers. Though most would consider
yoga a practice and not a religion--Yogaville
maintains religious tax exempt
status.
Background
of Satchidananda
Swami
Satchidananda came to the United States from India
in 1966 as part of a new trend popularizing neo-eastern
gurus that began with the Beatle's embrace of
the Maharishi
Mahesh Yogi. Satchidananda like Maharishi
was often promoted and supported by celebrities
(e.g. Carol King, singer/songwriter who donated
the funds to purchase 600 acres of land for Yogaville
and Peter Max,
artist). Perhaps a holdover from the 60s--Satchidananda
even attended the famous rock concert Woodstock.
Like other gurus before him and
many since Satchidananda found the United States
fertile ground for his own brand of eastern mysticism.
His following quickly grew to something like a
religious sect and he never returned to his native
country--except to visit.
Swami Satchidananda claims
to embrace a kind of ecumenical approach to faith
in which every religion is supposedly appreciated
as a different, but seemingly equal path to God.
He even built
a lavish structure called the "Lotus Shrine"
on his ashram acreage seemingly dedicated to this
principle. However, though his most devoted followers
come from different religious backgrounds many
have chosen instead to embrace their leader's
expressed path of Hinduism. But it should be noted
that "Hinduism Today", a respected journal regarding
the Hindu religion, has listed IYI in an
article questioning certain groups that claim
to observe the tenets and principles of "Hinduism".
Sex
and the single swami
Satchidananda has had his
share of scandal and controversy. Many of his
most devoted disciples left the guru amid a flurry
of serious allegations of sexual misconduct. The Montreal
Mirror reported that Susan Cohen once a disciple
of Satchidananda "calls the swami's community
a 'cult'" and feels he "involved her in an 'incestuous
secret affair.'" She explained, "the swami and
his students work in a type of father-daughter
relationship that leaves women confused and unable
to say no, a type of 'spiritual incest'...she
said she [had received] calls from all over the
country with similar stories."
Sylvia
Shapiro was a 19-year-old student of Satchidananda
in California when he asked her to travel with
him. According to reports he was once "the greatest
influence in her life, her guru, who taught his
unmarried followers to remain celibate, [but]
was urging that she have sexual relations with
him". Ms. Shapiro said. "I really loved him like
a father. I didn't want to make him angry."
After his former secretary Sylvia
Shapiro made accusations of sexual misconduct
Satchidananda was quoted in the "Village Voice"
newspaper (1976) as saying: "Don't judge me, I
am your guru. If you choose to believe it you
can leave right now. Or, if you have faith, you
can stay and continue in my service."
A former 12-year disciple of Satchidananda
Joy Zuckerman
concluded, "He said he was just here to serve
humanity and had no ego or selfishness. I think,
very subtly, he switched the teachings so they
were to serve him." Though Ms. Zuckerman was not
sexually exploited she still felt
abused stating--"I feel I've been abused in
other ways...I renounced everything, sold my home,
left my family gave $20,000, which a lawyer is
now trying to recover."
Update
Though the unhappy former members
quoted by the press in 1991 left some time ago--in
recent interviews they continue to confirm the
sexual misconduct of their one-time supposedly
celibate swami and the abuse they experienced
through his organization. Susan Cohen, now a mental
health professional, insists that she experienced
a form of "mind
control" or "brainwashing"
through her experience with Satchidananda, his
teachings and ashram. Sylvia Shapiro is now an
attorney and still sadly recounts her sexual exploitation.
Joy Zuckerman never recovered her assets and was
forced to start her life over again after more
than a decade of devotion to Satchidananda and
his teachings.
Satchidananda's
spiritual empire shrinks
Before news of a sex
scandal spread during 1991 IYI claimed to
have 50 centers in the United States and six in
Canada. But by 1996 the effects of published reports
regarding allegations against Swami Satchidananda
and the treatment of his followers seem to have
caused his influence to decline. In 1996 IYI reported
23 centers in the United States and four in Canada.
Many of the Swami's most devoted followers appear
to have departed from Yogaville, which may have
lost as many as half of its residents over the
years since 1991. Likewise, the number of IYI
teachers, according to a recent association report
is shrinking.
But it should be noted that
substantial assets totaling millions of dollars
remain as a residue of better days. This includes
substantial real estate holdings in Manhattan
(site of the classes recommend by DKNY) and Virginia,
Integral Yoga Natural Foods and Integral Yoga
Natural Vitamins located in Virginia and New York.
Interestingly, in a recent report
the President of Yogaville, a long-time devotee
of Satchidananda, seemed concerned about the group's
future--Satchidananda is now nearing ninety. He
admitted that members of the ashram have "felt
beaten down by the inhumanity of the system".
However, the group does not appear to have actually
changed significantly over the years, nor does
it seem to value meaningful checks and balances
regarding its member's conduct and the power of
their influence.
Problems
persist at IYI New York Center and Yogaville
Once again serious complaints swirl
around the Swami's ashram, IYI and its influence.
One young woman who attended the same classes recommended
by DKNY in Manhattan has caused alarm amongst
both her family and friends. They claim to have
observed radical changes in her behavior, personality
and thinking, which seem to have occurred as a
direct result of her involvement with IYI and
Yogaville.
The young woman, a law student
at CUNY, attended IYI classes for a brief period
before Christmas break in 1998. She had a close
relationship with her family, was planning marriage
with her long-time boyfriend and looked forward
to practicing law. After attending IYI classes
she decided to participate in a one-month residential
program at Yogaville. But the program never really
ended for the CUNY student. In a matter of weeks,
while within Yogaville, she abruptly decided to
drop out of law school, isolated herself from
family and friends and married a "swami" (30 years
older) she met while attending the ashram program.
Her husband, the now former celibate swami, is
a prominent long-time Yogaville member/Satchidananda
devotee. Her family feels she has been manipulated
and subjected to undue
influence through her involvement with IYI
and its programs.
"Collision
of extremes"?
Inside the elaborate DKNY booklet
its introduction describes "New York City [as]
a different state of mind" and a "magnet for the
eclectic. A haven for the extraordinary. The ultimate
collision of extremes". Just how extreme does
DKNY mean? Does Ms. Karan's vision of an "eclectic&haven
for the extraordinary" include promoting a "cult"
that generates serious complaints led by a Swami
with a sordid history, which includes allegations
regarding the sexual exploitation of women members?
The practice of yoga has
become quite popular recently and it has millions
of enthusiasts--many in the United States. It
is understandable that Donna Karan sought to follow
such a popular trend. However, what would seem
difficult for DKNY to deny is that it had a responsibility
to do better research before specifically promoting
IYI yoga classes. As a direct result of DKNY's
endorsement some may decide to include Integral
Yoga as one of their own "favorite classes". How
many young women that follow fashion will now
pursue, due to Ms. Karan's influence, the same
path tread by a young CUNY student who attended
classes in Manhattan? Then they might too be subjected
to the same training and influence that appears
to have ended in one family's heartbreak.
|