|
Labeling grisly murder doesn't alter its result.
Thus, if Matthew Shepard was not the victim of a hate crime
in Laramie, Wyo., that won't soften the grief of his parents
and friends, nor make him any less dead or his attackers any
less ignorant or vile. Yet if his open homosexuality is what
pushed their buttons, then in a strange, macabre way, his
death may signal more progress--albeit costly--in gays and
lesbians being accepted into the fellowship of society's mainstream.
A contradiction? Perhaps not.
It may be true, as some are saying, that anti-gay
extremists have come to believe they have the moral authority
to brutalize homosexuals based on the love-the-sinner/hate-the-sin
rhetoric mouthed by stalwarts of the religious right. Above
all, however, homophobia is driven by fear. And it's when
violence-prone bigots believe they are losing and that homosexuality
is closing in on them that their fear is exacerbated and panic
sets in, pushing them to strike out in desperation.
And losing they are, the pop-culture revolution washing over
them now reflected in the growing number of prominent gay
themes and characters in mainstream movies and TV series,
notably NBC's new comedy "Will & Grace."
It's Ellen DeGeneres' former ABC sitcom, "Ellen,"
though, that history will anoint as seminal when it comes
to gays on TV, one as important in its own right as "All
in the Family" or any other landmark you may want to
cite.
DeGeneres has spoken about the outpouring of
letters she's received from gay youth encouraged and emboldened
by her coming out as a lesbian and her urging for them to
take pride in who they are. "At that level, she's had
a very direct impact with young people across the country,"
said Rhona Berenstein, director of film studies at UC Irvine
and a board member of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against
Defamation.
The impact is even wider, though.
There's no evidence that Shepard's accused murderers
spent time in front of a TV set seething over "Ellen."
Jerry Springer seems more their style. Yet the whipped-up
wrangling that greeted the DeGeneres show's gay tilt in 1997
and 1998--as she and her protagonist, Ellen Morgan, outed
themselves almost together--swelled into a shrill national
debate that boomed stereophonically even with those who had
never seen "Ellen." From talk radio to talk TV,
if you were in Wyoming or anywhere else in the United States,
it was a subject you couldn't escape.
Although beginning in 1994 as "These Friends
of Mine," a routine comedy about a straight single woman,
"Ellen" went on to become prime time's first series
revolving around an openly gay character.
After a ratings surge when both DeGeneres and her "Ellen"
character disclosed they were lesbian, the show's audience
numbers went south, driving a stake through its heart and
making it all the easier for ABC and its parent, Disney, to
escape the hot seat by dumping the series last spring.
That by itself might not have been as inflammatory
if other factors hadn't interceded. Had DeGeneres matched
the perception of lesbians as being typically macho, combat-booted,
burly fireplugs with 15-inch biceps, many fewer angry protests
would have been heard from the crowd that accused "Ellen"
of having a "gay agenda." (As if sexuality were
ice cream and straight girls would tune in and want to be
Ellen's flavor.)
But she wasn't Arnold Schwarzenegger in a bra.
If she had been, as Berenstein points out, the show's humor
would have been largely about that instead of the "matters
of the heart" that occupied Ellen Morgan's final season.
Instead, she was someone infinitely more terrifying,
at least to those fearful of gays. What daylight was to nocturnal
Dracula, Ellen Morgan was to zealots who worked the stump
depicting gays as demons. The mere sight of her made them
shrink in terror.
The menace? She was ordinary, she was benign.
Ellen was lesbian with a biting, self-deprecating
humor. Otherwise, she was tenaciously conventional, just another
insecure face in the crowd, struggling to cope and find her
way. Even after tiptoeing gingerly from the closet, she was
no slickie when it came to romance or smoothing the wrinkles
in a life full of common denominators that straight America
could relate to.
It was her low-key normalcy--beamed week after
week to some 12 million viewers even at the show's lowest
point--that terrified many of the "Ellen" critics
who demanded it be pulled. And it was her attraction to other
women, however timorously expressed, that outraged them.
There would have been fewer loud beefs, surely, had "Ellen"
adhered to the sexually neutral course followed by TV's newest
sitcom with a gay leading character, the moderately popular
"Will & Grace." It has not drawn the ire of
the anti-gay crowd, and no wonder.
Heterosexual Grace (Debra Messing) and gay Will
(Eric McCormack) are housemates. He is masculine, in striking
contrast to the flaming male stereotype that for years has
been among comedy's cheapest laughs. So let's do hear it for
diversity. In another way, though, "Will & Grace"
and "Ellen" differ significantly.
Ellen Morgan acted on her long-latent sexual
yearnings. She embraced, even kissed her girlfriend, something
that ticked off a moralist slice of America that has been
curiously mum this season about the record number of prime-time
heterosexual sitcoms interwoven with sex themes.
In contrast, although Will's prissy buddy, Jack
(Sean Hayes), goes for guys, Will seems testosterone-challenged.
Not that he should spend all his time humping or thinking
about it, as some straight sitcom characters do. And not that
"Will & Grace" isn't pleasant enough the way
it is. Yet as far as one can tell after watching three episodes,
Will is gay in name only, the lone clear sign being that he
is platonic with the luscious babe with whom he lives. So
far, in fact, he's outwardly attracted to no one.
Depictions on "Ellen" and Roseanne's
famous lesbian kiss on her own ABC sitcom notwithstanding,
gay smooching--and perhaps even touching--are a step no network
appears willing to take at the moment.
Some viewers rejected "Ellen" because they didn't
find it funny, others surely in anger over both her and her
character being lesbian. What isn't known is how many are
wiser today because of exposure to her, and to what extent
that tolerance evokes fear in some circles.
As Berenstein notes, we're shaped by many factors,
of which television is just one. Thus, she adds, "Ellen"
could change minds for the better only as part of an overall
climate for increased acceptance of diversity.
She is optimistic about TV getting ever smarter
about gays. "It's a moderate optimism," she said.
"Television is motivated by economics, not by good will
or changing social mores. It won't ever be a radical forum
for social change. And it's a problem to expect that of television."
So be thankful for "Ellen" and other streaks of
light, while mourning the loss of a Wyoming college student
whose killers may have been terrified of what he was and the
changes in America that he stood for.
Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times. All Rights
Reserved
|