Richmond Council vs Gays & Lesbians
     
 

Right to express views as a private citizen

SIR - I would appreciate the opportunity to put the record straight following letters from Messrs Silk and Grant last week (March 19) accusing me of hypocrisy and humbug.

First let me correct Mr Silk by pointing out that he repeats a wholly incorrect interpretation of my words. At no time have I threatened the local borough-wide independent community websites with "immediate closure" (or any other sort of closure). I am happy to place on record my support for our community websites, praise their role and state my appreciation for their contribution of newsworthy items to the life of the borough. I have willingly contributed items of local interest in the past (one of the few councillors to do so) and have been solicited for such by the team who run the websites.

Insofar as Mr Grant's misrepresentation that I believe Roman Catholics, Evangelical Christians "and other decent folk should not be councillors in case they express opinions", it is of course a complete nonsense. What I described as "crass" by Cllr Dance - one of the few Tory councillors with whom I talk regularly - was her use of her councillor's email pathway. (A mistake, incidentally, that I also made recently and for which I apologise.)

Although I did not agree with Hilary's views, I nonetheless believe she has a right to express them as a private citizen. For the record, Mr Grant may like to note that I was brought up as an Evangelical Christian.

In fact, I was confirmed at that pinnacle of Evangelical Anglicanism, All Souls Langham Place by the late Bishop Reindorp, father of Richmond's much-respected Rev Julian Reindorp.

I still visit All Souls as often as possible. He might also like to note that my late paternal grandparents were Roman Catholic.

Marc Cranfield-Adams Sheen Court, Richmond